UM version4.5 benchmarks
Revision as of 15:27, 17 December 2012 by GethinWilliams (talk | contribs)
Benchmarking UM Version4.5 on different Architectures
Preamble
- Cluster/Parallel file systems are often a bottleneck.
 - If the model is not filesystem-bound, it is often (MPI massage) latency-bound.
 - Only the master process writes output, this can lead to load-balance issues, which hinder scaling.
 
AMD Bulldozer
Intel Westmere
Intel SandyBridge
- Test system: Quad socket, 8-core E-4650L (2.60GHz) (L for Low power)
 - 20MB L3 cache
 
| MPI message latency | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 bytes | 128 bytes | 1024 bytes | |
| between sockets | ~0.70us | ~1.15us | ~2.0us | 
FAMOUS
| Domain Decomposition | Number of Cores | Model-years/day | 
| 4x2 | 8 | ~327 | 
| 8x2 | 16 | ~450 | 
| 8x4 | 32 | ~480 | 
- The last line of this table shows a real problem scaling beyond 16 cores. Load balance?
 - Would like to try to improve file writing performance and re-run.
 
HadCM3
| Domain Decomposition | Number of Cores | Model-years/day | 
| 8x2 | 16 | ~48 | 
| 8x4 | 32 | ~65 |