Difference between revisions of "Glam:compilers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
During development in early summer 2008 a number of compiler specific issues were discovered with glam. After some development work glam should now compile and run with the following ccompilers: | During development in early summer 2008 a number of compiler specific issues were discovered with glam. After some development work glam should now compile and run with the following ccompilers: | ||
* ifort (intel) | * ifort (intel) | ||
| − | * gfortran | + | * gfortran |
* g95 | * g95 | ||
* f95 (Sun) | * f95 (Sun) | ||
Revision as of 13:48, 3 July 2008
During development in early summer 2008 a number of compiler specific issues were discovered with glam. After some development work glam should now compile and run with the following ccompilers:
- ifort (intel)
- gfortran
- g95
- f95 (Sun)
- pgf90 (Portland Group)
Note that g95 gives much slower performance than the others. Sun gives probably the fastest run times.