Difference between revisions of "Glam:compilers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | During development in early summer 2008 a number of compiler specific issues were discovered with glam. After some development work glam should now compile and run with the following ccompilers: | |
| + | * ifort (intel) | ||
| + | * gfortran (gnu) | ||
| + | * g95 | ||
| + | * f95 (Sun) | ||
| + | * pgf90 (Portland Group) | ||
| − | + | Note that g95 gives much slower performance than the others. Sun gives probably the fastest run times. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 13:48, 3 July 2008
During development in early summer 2008 a number of compiler specific issues were discovered with glam. After some development work glam should now compile and run with the following ccompilers:
- ifort (intel)
- gfortran (gnu)
- g95
- f95 (Sun)
- pgf90 (Portland Group)
Note that g95 gives much slower performance than the others. Sun gives probably the fastest run times.